How are policy violations formally reviewed in SWLCAT?

In SWLCAT, policy violations are formally reviewed through a designated review committee assigned by leadership. This structure ensures that the process is conducted systematically and complies with established protocols, allowing for an impartial evaluation of the case. The formation of a review committee allows for a diverse group of individuals to bring various perspectives and expertise to the review process, which can lead to more comprehensive conclusions about the violation and appropriate actions.

This method provides an organized approach to handling violations, as it clarifies roles and responsibilities, ensuring that each case is handled with due diligence. Additionally, having a dedicated committee can enhance accountability, as the members are tasked with adhering to the guidelines and standards set forth by the organization.

The other options, such as conducting the review in a public forum or through regular staff meetings, would not offer the confidentiality and thoroughness required for sensitive evaluations. Involving a third-party auditor may be appropriate in certain contexts but is not the standard procedure within SWLCAT for policy violations, as this could complicate the internal review process and undermine the established internal governance structure.